| Corporate Accountability
London's Ecological Footprint
Oil has brought misery to the people of the Niger
Delta. While it enriches the economies of the developed world, it
has impoverished many of the countries from which it is exported.
Oil is a major source of greenhouse gases that
cause climate change, threatening the world's poor further by destabilising
the ecosystems they depend on.
Oil is a major source of air pollution, responsible
for acid rain, respiratory illnesses and cancers.
The production, transportation and processing of
oil has polluted many parts of the planet. Tanker spills, refinery
emissions, gas flares, oil well blow-outs, all have spilled highly
toxic fluids and gases into the atmosphere, across land and into
rivers and oceans around the world.
Oil is a source of conflict, corruption and crime.
All of this has to be taken into account when considering
the riches and comforts that oil has brought us.
But who has been in receipt of the riches
and comforts that oil furnishes?
Those that live in regions from which oil is mined,
on the whole, do not enjoy the benefits.
In the Niger Delta, the forests of Ecuador and
Colombia, in Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, in Angola and Equatorial
Guinea, in Aceh and Russia's far east or north west and in Iran,
Iraq and Saudi Arabia. People living amidst great wealth have received
very little for the sacrifices they have been forced to make for
the oil industry.
Their leaders, more often than not, are fabulously
wealthy as they re-direct their nation's wealth into the off-shore
accounts of their family and friends. Their military budgets swollen
both by the available revenues but also by the need to protect themselves
from those that seek to capture their wealth; whether they be regional
or global contenders, political enemies from within their borders,
or the people, for so long denied access to what is theirs.
Meanwhile, developing countries with economies
not dependent on oil exports register far better economic performance.
People in the oil dependent countries do not necessarily
want to stop oil production. They want a fair deal. They want their
environment cleaned up and a fair share of the wealth. They want
companies and governments to treat them like human beings and not
dispensable obstacles to the realisation of oil revenues. In very
few cases does this occur.
We need to consider the winners and losers of the
oil age. The big oil companies - ExxonMobil, BP, Shell, TotalFinaElf,
ChevronTexaco, ConocoPhillips - are the biggest money making machines
in history. In 2004, with oil prices soaring, many of them registered
the largest profits in history. They distribute their profits to
shareholders, predominately in developed countries. They pay the
bulk of their taxes in developed countries. They enjoy the political
and strategic support of the world's most powerful governments.
Can the oil industry be more democratic and egalitarian?
Can it realise benefits to the majority and not the privileged few?
Can it operate without polluting? When it makes mistakes can it
repair and compensate adequately? The lessons of the past suggest
that it can not.
Climate change imposes limits on how much time
we can give the oil industry to clean up its act. The need to find
sustainable sources of energy that give us a realistic sense of
ecological limits is urgent. Climate change will impact the poor
the hardest, providing a double-whammy for those impoverished by
its production in their midst.
A number of groups are campaigning to reform the
oil industry or for the timely transition to a new paradigm of energy
production and consumption; one in which the benefits and costs
are more evenly distributed and the planet is respected and preserved.
Links
The
Carbon Web
Plan
B
JumpStart
Ford Campaign
Refinery
Reform Campaign
Sustainable
Energy & Economy Network
Shell
Facts
Please also see the climate change and
other campaign pages on our coalition member's websites. Click on
the 'top' link to see our coalition partners.
TOP
|